District Court of Munich I, Judgement of 19/05/2004 – file reference: 21 0 6123/04 (Open Source – effectiveness of GPL)

ar X iv : h ep - p h / 04 05 11 9 v 1 1 3 M ay 2 00 4 The Lorentz and CPT violating effects on the charged

Investigating the functional effectiveness of residential complexes open space on residents' attachment (Case study: Municipal District No.6, Shiraz City)

Introduction: Place attachment is the intersection of physical elements, activities, and mental concepts concerning place, formed from the environmental characteristics and individuals' mental patterns and evaluation. Based on the available resources, it seems that improving the functional efficiency of residential open spaces can help to improve the level of people's attachment. Methodology: T...

An Open Source Tool for Semi-automatic Rhythmic Annotation

We present a plugin implementation for the multi-platform WaveSurfer sound editor. Added functionalities are the semi-automatic extraction of beats at diverse levels of the metrical hierarchy as well as uploading and downloading functionalities to a music metadata database. It is built upon existing open source (GPL-licenced) audio processing tools, namely WaveSurfer, BeatRoot and CLAM, in the ...

Compilation a Model for Reporting Effectiveness for Stakeholders (Case Study in the Superum Audit Court)

Developing a Reporting Effectiveness Model for Stakeholders (Case Study in the Superum Audit Court) Abstract: The Court of Auditors' reports are an independent and rational assessment of the environment in the public sector and strive to enhance the value of government agencies through legislation and guidance to improve performance. The purpose of the present study is to conceptualize and ext...

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

Google and Overture Services, Inc. (“Overture”). A First Amended Complaint was filed on May 14, 2004, and on November 29, 2004, Overture was dismissed as a defendant. Therefore, all references to the Complaint in this Opinion are to the First Amended Complaint, and only Google remains as a defendant. In a previous Memorandum Opinion discussed more fully below, the Court dismissed Google’s Motio...